Changes at "Items/dimensions: Research rationale and problem"

FAIL (D)

Arguments for the interest of the research are not given, or are insufficient or inappropriate to justify its scientific and social relevance.

The research problem is not clearly formulated, does not fit into any of the research lines of the doctoral programme, or is not correctly focused and positioned within a specific theoretical framework.

FAIR (C)

Arguments for the interest of the research are given, but they are not entirely sufficient or appropriate to justify its scientific and social relevance.

The research problem fits into one of the doctoral programme's research lines, but it is not clearly formulated or focused and positioned within a specific theoretical framework.

GOOD (B)

Sufficient arguments are given for the appropriateness and interest of the research, although they could be more explicit about its usefulness and expected benefits or outcomes.

The research problem is formulated and defined theoretically, geographically and temporally. It is positioned within a specific theoretical framework, but could be better explained or developed. It fits into one of the research lines of the doctoral programme.

EXCELLENT (A)

The general motivations for undertaking the study are explained and the appropriateness, relevance, usefulness, feasibility and interest of the research are coherently and sufficiently justified from both a social and a scientific point of view.

The research problem is clearly formulated and defined theoretically, geographically and temporally. It is correctly focused and positioned within a specific theoretical framework. It fits perfectly into one of the research lines in the doctoral programme.

Weighting

10%

(this section must be marked Fair or above in order for the research plan to be approved)

Open Comments

(Write here your comments or suggestions)