RG describes its results in the past 5 years (or from the last evaluation). Again, this description should be in a narrative shape, supported with appropriate evidence (in the shape of figures, in a table or figure). Specific examples of case studies are strongly encouraged to illustrate these achievements. This process allows the assessment committee to understand the achievements and results concerning the strategy. The results relate to research quality and social relevance and include a reflection on the teaching-research nexus, where applicable. The narrative can be substantiated by indicators and by referring to the case studies.
Accomplishments should include results on the specific aspects, 1) Interdisciplinarity, 2) Open Science, 3) PhD Policy and Training, 4) Academic Culture, and 5) Human Resources Policy.
Share